THE LIKELY EFFECT OF STANDARD AND POOR (S&P) RATING UPGRADE ON THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR
By: Buhlebemvelo Dube and Mahlogedi Thindisa
S&P Global Ratings has upgraded South Africa’s long-term sovereign ratings, assigning the country BB for foreign currency and BB+ for local currency, with positive outlook. South Africa’s sovereign rating upgrade marks a decisive shift in the country’s macroeconomic position since August 2005 without an improvement. For agriculture, one of the most capital-intensive and export-dependent sectors, the upgrade resets financial expectations at a time when the industry is undergoing structural transformation, heightened climate volatility, and persistent logistical constraints. The rating action, anchored in fiscal consolidation and improving state-owned enterprise performance, is more than a symbolic milestone; it alters the cost of capital, stabilises expectations, and strengthens the investment case for strategic agricultural expansion.
The latest agricultural industry data reveal a sector whose economic footprint continues to widen despite operating in a high-risk global environment. The gross value of agricultural production reached R491.7 billion in 2023, rising at an annualised rate of 6.8% since 2017. Horticulture, mixed farming, and field crops remain strong pillars, while the income share from farming animals has declined from 40.2% to 37.8%. Employment trends mirror this reconfiguration: horticulture’s workforce expanded from 275,909 to 311,426, accounting for over 40% of agricultural labour. Fertiliser and agricultural services more than doubled their income share from 1.1% to 2.5%, reflecting an industry gravitating towards more input-intensive, technologically embedded production systems.
These shifts demonstrate why the decision on sovereign rating upgrade was taken at a critical moment. Agriculture relies disproportionately on long-term finance for irrigation, storage, green energy solutions, mechanisation, and biological inputs. Lower sovereign risk reduces borrowing costs, improves credit appetite, and raises the capacity of both commercial banks and development finance institutions to extend medium to long-term loans. Producers operating in capital-heavy segments such as fruit, vegetables, poultry, and value-added processing stand to benefit almost immediately. Emerging and smallholder farmers, who often face binding credit constraints, will experience improved affordability of seasonal and investment credit, helping to close historic financing gaps. The upgrade also stabilises the currency environment, a central factor in agricultural performance considering South Africa imports most of its fertiliser, animal feed components, machinery, and agro chemicals. Currency volatility has been a major driver of input cost inflation and margin erosion in recent years. A firmer, stable rand lowers the landed cost of inputs and improves planning certainty for producers. On the export side, predictable exchange-rate conditions reduce hedging costs and enhance contract reliability for citrus, table grapes, apples, wine, maize, beef, and wool. This benefits provinces with export profiles, including the Western Cape, which contributed R100.9 billion to national agricultural income, and Mpumalanga, Gauteng, and the Eastern Cape, whose horticultural and mixed-farming systems are expanding rapidly.
Logistics and infrastructure form the second primary channel through which sovereign upgrades influence agricultural competitiveness. The rating improvement signals renewed confidence in South Africa’s ability to rehabilitate critical infrastructure such as ports, rail, irrigation systems, municipal water networks and green energy supply. Agriculture’s competitiveness is inseparable from efficient logistics, the reduced cost of public borrowing and increased appetite for private sector partnerships strengthen the feasibility of long-delayed investments. This is particularly significant for export-oriented horticulture, where port congestion, power interruptions, and cold-chain breakdowns have imposed high opportunity costs.
The upgrade also carries significant behavioural effects. Investment in agriculture depends not only on current profitability but on confidence in future policy stability. The rating improvement provides macro-level assurance that South Africa’s fiscal stance and reform commitments are credible. It gives farmers the certainty needed to expand hectares, invest in packhouses and irrigation, adopt climate-smart technologies, and engage in multi-year contracts with retailers and international buyers. In a sector facing increasing climate and market risk, confidence is itself a form of economic capital. Still, the upgrade does not eliminate the structural constraints highlighted by the agricultural survey. Declining income shares in animal farming reflect disease pressures, feed cost inflation, and infrastructural inefficiencies. Field-crop production remains vulnerable to climatic shocks. Municipal service weaknesses continue to shape irrigation reliability and local infrastructure. Without targeted interventions, strengthened biosecurity systems, improved water governance, accelerated port reforms, and deeper electricity stabilisation, the benefits of the upgrade may not fully translate into higher productivity or broader participation.
Even so, the rating action shifts the macroeconomic baseline in ways that agriculture can leverage immediately. Cheaper finance, stronger currency conditions, heightened investor confidence, and renewed infrastructure momentum create an enabling environment for accelerated agricultural growth. Suppose South Africa aligns these conditions with strategic reforms, supporting blended finance, rehabilitating logistics corridors, scaling climate-resilience investments, and improving regulatory coherence. In that scenario, the aspirations of the Agriculture and Agro processing Master Plan (AAMP) may likely be realised. The sector can consolidate its upward income trajectory and absorb more labour, particularly in fast-growing horticulture.

